4.1 Social demographic characteristics of respondents
The Survey targeted 380 respondents. However, information was collected from at least 300 respondents through the administered online questionnaires. In terms of response percentage, that stood at about 79% response rate, of which N=153 (51%) female and N= 147 (49%) were male with total mean=1.5 and SD=0.501. On marital status, the majority the respondents close to N=279 (93%) were single, out of which N= 258 (86%) belonged to the age group of more than 20 but less than 30, about N=237 (79%) of them were pursuing undergraduate studies, of which N=163 (54.3%) were doing medicine-related programme followed by N=68 (22.7%) who were doing engineering courses. Moreover, about N=192 (64%) of the respondents indicated that they had been staying in China for more than 2 years and lastly on religion affiliation about N=155 (51%) of them were Christians followed by N=111 (27.1 %) who were Moslems with total Mean= 1.93 and SD= 1.131(see table 1 ).
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of respondents
Independent Variable
|
Frequency
|
Percent (%)
|
Valid Percent
|
Cumulative Percent (%)
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Gender
|
Male
|
147
|
49.0
|
49.0
|
49.0
|
|
|
Female
|
153
|
51.0
|
51.0
|
100.0
|
|
|
Total (n)
|
300
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
1.51
|
0.501
|
Age Group
|
<20
|
19
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
|
|
20-30
|
258
|
86.0
|
86.0
|
92.3
|
|
|
30+
|
23
|
7.7
|
7.7
|
100.0
|
|
|
Total (n)
|
300
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
2.01
|
0.375
|
Marital Status
|
Single
|
279
|
93.0
|
93.0
|
93.0
|
|
|
Married
|
12
|
4.0
|
4.0
|
97.0
|
|
|
Others
|
9
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
100.0
|
|
|
Total(n)
|
300
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
1.13
|
0.542
|
Level of Program
|
Undergraduate
|
237
|
79.0
|
79.0
|
79.0
|
|
|
Postgraduate
|
63
|
21.0
|
21.0
|
100.0
|
|
|
Total (n)
|
300
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
1.21
|
0.408
|
Major
|
Medical Related Programs
|
163
|
54.3
|
54.3
|
54.3
|
|
|
Engineering Related Programs
|
68
|
22.7
|
22.7
|
77.0
|
|
|
Agriculture Related Program
|
21
|
7.0
|
7.0
|
84.0
|
|
|
Business Related Program
|
26
|
8.7
|
8.7
|
92.7
|
|
|
Others
|
22
|
7.3
|
7.3
|
100.0
|
|
|
Total (n)
|
300
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
1.92
|
1.272
|
Experience
|
<1
|
57
|
19.0
|
19.0
|
19.0
|
|
|
1-2
|
51
|
17.0
|
17.0
|
36.0
|
|
|
2+
|
192
|
64.0
|
64.0
|
100.0
|
|
|
Total(n)
|
300
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
2.45
|
0.793
|
Religion Affiliation
|
Islam
|
111
|
37.0
|
37.0
|
37.0
|
|
|
Christian
|
155
|
51.7
|
51.7
|
88.7
|
|
|
Buddhist
|
6
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
90.7
|
|
|
Hinduism
|
4
|
1.3
|
1.3
|
92.0
|
|
|
Don’t want to disclose
|
19
|
6.3
|
6.3
|
98.3
|
|
|
Others
|
5
|
1.7
|
1.7
|
100.0
|
|
|
Total (n)
|
300
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
|
1.93
|
1.131
|
4.2 Sources of information about COVID-19 disease control and preventative measures
The respondents were asked about the main source of information for COVID-19 disease control and preventative measures, the results indicate that majority of them extracted information from Internet N=211 (70.3%) followed by school notifications N=75 (25%) (see table 2).
Table 2: Showing results on the sources of information
Source of Information
|
Frequency
|
Percent (%)
|
|
|
Internet Platforms
|
211
|
70.3*
|
|
School Notification
|
75
|
25.0*
|
|
Wires, TV and Radio
|
7
|
2.3
|
|
Family and Friends
|
3
|
1.0
|
|
Others Means
|
4
|
1.3
|
|
Total
|
300
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: *Indicates important significant and major findings at 25%
4.3 Knowledge about COVID-19 disease control and preventative measures
Table 3 shows the results regarding knowledge about COVID-19, the results showed that the majority of the students reveal above the average of 50% which is given as the baseline for good knowledge by assessing the causes. Furthermore, results indicate that the vast majority, N=288 (96%), of the respondents had knowledge about the COVID-19 mode of spread, about N=288 (96%) indicate their awareness as a highly contagious disease, about N=281(93.7%) respondents found aware of the potentially fatal risks associated with COVID-19, while, N=288 (96%) showed knowledge about the symptoms of COVID-19 and about N=270 (90%) among students demonstrated that they held no misconception of COVID-19 (see table 3).
Table 3: Showing results about knowledge about COVID-19 disease
|
Knowledge Questions
|
YES(F)
|
YES- (%)
|
NO(F)
|
NO (%)
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
1
|
Do you Know that COVID-19 is an infectious disease
|
288
|
96*
|
12
|
4
|
288
|
96.0
|
2
|
Do you Know that COVID-19 is Zoonotic Pathogen Virus Which Can Spread from Animals to Human through Contacts
|
223
|
74.3*
|
77
|
25.7
|
223
|
74.3
|
3
|
Do you Know that COVID-19 Could Spread through Cough, and Sneezes or from touching object that has been contaminated with the Virus
|
294
|
98*
|
6
|
2
|
294
|
98.0
|
4
|
Do you Know that they are risk if you recently travelled from all resident in area with an ongoing spread of COVID-19 as determined by WHO
|
281
|
93.7*
|
19
|
6.3
|
281
|
93.7
|
5
|
Do you Know that they are risk if you had close contact with someone who has COVID-19 Virus such as classmate?
|
260
|
86.7*
|
40
|
13.3
|
260
|
86.7
|
6
|
Do you Know that they are risk if you had close contact with someone who has COVID-19 Virus such as teachers and anyone who have been taking care of the infected person
|
260
|
86.7*
|
40
|
13.3
|
260
|
86.7
|
7
|
Do you Know that they are risk to anyone who has chronical underlying healthy conditions like diabetes, high blood pressure, heart and lung diseases
|
249
|
83*
|
51
|
17
|
249
|
83.0
|
8
|
Do You know this Symptom of COVID-19-Fever
|
288
|
96*
|
12
|
4
|
288
|
96.0
|
9
|
Do You know this Symptom of COVID-19-Cough
|
288
|
96*
|
12
|
4
|
288
|
96.0
|
10
|
Do You know this Symptom of COVID-19-Diffuculty in Breathing
|
287
|
95.7*
|
13
|
4.3
|
287
|
95.7
|
11
|
Do You know this Symptom of COVID-19-Tiredeness
|
266
|
88.7*
|
34
|
11.3
|
266
|
88.7
|
12
|
Do You know this Symptom of COVID-19-Running Nose
|
229
|
76.3*
|
71
|
23.7
|
229
|
76.3
|
13
|
Do You know this Symptom of COVID-19-Sore Throat
|
263
|
87.7*
|
37
|
12.3
|
263
|
87.7
|
Note: * indicates answers given above 50* which indicates good Knowledge
4.4 Misconceptions about COVID-19 disease control and preventative measures
While answering the questions asked to assess their misconception towards COVID-19, the results indicated that the majority had no misconception, as the results were also all above 50% answering Yes and No where necessary which was acting as a baseline with reference to world Health organisation guidelines as follows; N=217 (72%) the Virus can be killed on the sun, N=270 (90%) the Virus can be killed by drinking alcohol, N=240 (80%) the Virus cannot young people, N=246 (82%) the Virus cannot kill people with special genes and N=187(62.3%) that indeed the Virus can contaminate the atmosphere air (see table 4).
Table 4: Showing misconceptions results
|
Statement
|
YES(F)
|
YES-(%)
|
NO(F)
|
NO (%)
|
1
|
How do you think- COVID-19 can be killed by staying on the Sun
|
83
|
27.7
|
217
|
72.3*
|
2
|
How do you think- COVID-19 can be killed by drinking a lot of alcohol or beer
|
30
|
10
|
270*
|
90*
|
3
|
How do you think- COVID-19 cannot kill young people
|
60
|
20
|
240
|
80*
|
4
|
How do you think- COVID-19 cannot kill other people because they have special genes
|
54
|
18
|
246
|
82*
|
8
|
How do you think- COVID-19 can contaminate atmosphere air
|
187
|
62.3*
|
113
|
37.7
|
Note: * indicates answers given above 50%* which indicates good attitudes
4.5 Attitude and Perception towards COVID-19 disease control and preventative measures
Results about respondents’ attitudes towards COVID-19 are illustrated in table 5. The results calculated above 50% which was set as the baseline of positive attitude. It shows that the majority of the respondents i.e. N=195 (65%) disagreed with the conception “COVID-19” is a punishment from God, while N=240 (80%) of them also stated that COVID-19 could be associated with any person. Furthermore, after being asked about their safety perceptions, the majority i.e. N=264 (80%) believed that it is safe to stay in China despite the outbreak.
Table 5: Showing attitudes of respondents
|
Statement
|
YES(F)
|
YES- (%)
|
NO(F)
|
NO (%)
|
1
|
It was a punishment from God
|
105
|
35
|
195
|
65*
|
2
|
It was a disease associated with other people not me
|
60
|
20
|
240
|
80*
|
3
|
Do you still feel safe here in China after the outbreak of COVID-19
|
264
|
88*
|
36
|
12
|
Note: * indicates answers given above 50%* which indicates good attitudes
4.6 Practices of COVID-19 disease preventative measures
In table 6, preventive practices applying by respondents which were announced by the government or authorities are revealed. The results show that the majority of the respondents keenly following all the set of preventive practices as many scores were above 50% which was the baseline for practises to be followed in this study. Moreover, results indicate that N=100 (100%) respondents use obligatory face masks when doing outdoor activities, while, about N=256 (85.3%) did not allow visitors in their university dormitories. It is found that N=299 (99.7%) were washing their hands frequently and N=282 (94%) did not touch their faces with hands when they were dirty. The results indicate that N=287 (95.7%) avoided going out and kept a distance of 3 metres from anyone.
Table 6: Showing preventative practices by students
|
Statement
|
YES(F)
|
YES- (%)
|
NO(F)
|
NO (%)
|
1
|
Wearing Mask when going out
|
300
|
100*
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
No visitors entertaining in dormitory
|
256
|
85.3*
|
44
|
14.7
|
3
|
Washing hands frequently with soaps
|
299
|
99.7*
|
1
|
0.3
|
4
|
Don’t touching your face, eyes and nose when hands are dirty
|
282
|
94*
|
18
|
6
|
5
|
Don’t go out if you’re feeling sick or having any symptoms
|
287
|
95.7*
|
13
|
4.3
|
6
|
Keeping a distance of 3 feet away from anyone
|
287
|
95.7*
|
13
|
4.3
|
Note: * indicates answers given above 50%* which indicates good preventative practices
4.7 Univariate and Bivariate Analysis
4.7.1 Knowledge and practices scores
As it is revealed in methodology section that the questionnaire prepared had 13 questions for knowledge while, 5 for misconception, 3 for attitude and 6 for preventative practices section, each question used dummy variable as 1 score and 0 as, 1 for individual with good knowledge and 0 for individual with poor knowledge, score =1 for individual not misconception, and 0 for individual misconception, total knowledge scores = all knowledge + all not misconception, for attitude score = 1 for good attitude and 0 for negative attitude, and lastly for preventive practices score = 1 for good preventative practices and 0 for bad practices. Correlation between knowledge and practice score found insignificant.
On the distribution of knowledge and practices scores the results reveal that the mean knowledge scores vary significantly across age group (P<0.01) and major of study (P=0.025), while the mean scores of the practices varies significantly between major of study (P=0.015) and experience (P<0.01) while there are no significance variations in attitude means scores (see table 7).
Table 7: Distribution of knowledge and preventive practice scores among international students in China
Characteristics
|
Knowledge score SD
|
F value
|
P value
|
Attitude
score SD
|
F value
|
P value
|
Practice score SD
|
F value
|
P value
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male
|
15.23 2.27
|
1.24
|
.267
|
2.33 0.66
|
.07
|
.093
|
7.61 0.68
|
2.67
|
.103
|
Female
|
14.94 2.25
|
2.33 0.72
|
|
|
7.46 0.87
|
Age group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<20
|
13.63±3.82
|
5.67
|
.004**
|
2.47 0.51
|
|
|
7.42
|
0.63
|
.536
|
20-30
|
15.12 2.11
|
2.31 0.71
|
.57
|
.566
|
7.55 0.77
|
30+
|
15.91 1.68
|
2.39 0.58
|
|
|
7.39 0.99
|
Marital status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single
|
15.01 2.30
|
2.11
|
.123
|
2.32 0.68
|
|
|
7.51 0.80
|
.671
|
.512
|
Married
|
16.17 1.02
|
2.41 0.90
|
|
|
7.67 0.49
|
Divorced
|
|
|
.203`
|
.816
|
|
Others
|
15.89 1.69
|
2.22 0.83
|
|
|
7.78 0.44
|
Level of program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undergraduate
|
14.97 2.27
|
3.051
|
.082
|
2.34 0.65
|
|
|
7.51 0.76
|
.221
|
.639
|
Postgraduate
|
15.52 2.16
|
2.20 0.83
|
.328
|
.567
|
7.57 0.86
|
Major
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical
|
15.28 2.06
|
2.832
|
.025**
|
2.31 0.67
|
|
|
7.48 0.78
|
3.128
|
.015**
|
Engineering
|
14.56 2.54
|
2.41 0.67
|
|
|
7.74 0.56
|
Agriculture
|
15.81 1.86
|
2.24 0.88
|
.412
|
.796
|
7.76 0.43
|
Business
|
15.38 2.56
|
2.26 0.67
|
|
|
7.19
|
Others
|
14.18 2.38
|
2.36 0.72
|
|
|
7.45 1.05
|
Experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1
|
15.16 2.29
|
1.643
|
.195
|
2.47 0.68
|
|
|
7.84 0.37
|
5.733
|
.004**
|
1-2
|
15.57 2.40
|
2.25 0.62
|
1.65
|
.195
|
7.47 0.75
|
2+
|
14.93 2.21
|
2.30 0.70
|
|
|
7.45 0.86
|
Religion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Islam
|
14.83 2.56
|
2.124
|
.063
|
2.25 0.65
|
|
|
7.64 0.61
|
1.397
|
.225
|
Christian
|
15.44 1.96
|
2.34 0.69
|
|
|
7.43 0.93
|
Buddhist
|
14.00 1.26
|
2.50 0.54
|
1.152
|
.333
|
7.67 0.52
|
Hindu
|
13.75 2.06
|
2.25 0.50
|
|
|
7.50 0.58
|
Don’t want to disclose
|
14.32 2.66
|
2.63 0.68
|
|
|
7.73 0.45
|
Others
|
14.80 1.30
|
2.20 0.44
|
|
|
7.20 0.44
|
Note: * indicates the statistic is significant at the 0.1 level and ** indicates significant at the 0.05 level, SD = Standard Deviation
According to the linear regression analysis, after converting the independent variables into binary form, the results show that age group of <20 (vs. Other converts, 𝛽= -1.635; P<0.01), major convert 2 of Engineering (vs. other converts 𝛽= -0.956; P<0.01), major convert 5 of others (vs. other converts, 𝛽= -.1.200; P=0.018) and religion convert 1 of Islam (vs. other convert 2 of Christianity, 𝛽= -0.559; P=0.040) are significantly associated with lower knowledge score. On the other hand, major convert 2 of Engineering (vs. other converts , 𝛽= 0.265; P=0.012), Experience Convert 1 of <1 (vs. other converts, 𝛽= 0.449; P<0.01) and religion convert 1 of Islam (vs. other converts , 𝛽= 0.248; P<0.01) are significantly associated with high practice scores (see table , 8 and 9).
Table 8: linear regression model output obtained using the backward likelihood ratio method for knowledge scores
Convert
|
|
Std. Error
|
t
|
Sig.
|
Intercept
|
15.586
|
.206
|
75.690
|
.000
|
Age First Convert (<20)
|
-1.635
|
.526
|
-3.108
|
.002*
|
Age Third Convert (30+)
|
.831
|
.482
|
1.723
|
.086
|
Marital Converted 4 (Others)
|
1.244
|
.747
|
1.667
|
.097
|
Major Converted2 (Engin.)
|
-.956
|
.306
|
-3.119
|
.002*
|
Major Converted 5(other)
|
-1.200
|
.503
|
-2.385
|
.018**
|
Experience Converted 2(1-2)
|
.570
|
.335
|
1.704
|
.089
|
Religion Converted1(Islam)
|
-.559
|
.270
|
-2.067
|
.040**
|
Religion Converted 4(Buddhi)
|
-1.836
|
1.096
|
-1.674
|
.095
|
Religion Converted5(D.W.D)
|
-.959
|
.526
|
-1.824
|
.069
|
Table 9: linear regression model output obtained using the backward likelihood ratio method for practice scores
Convert
|
|
Std. Error
|
t
|
Sig.
|
Intercept
|
7.271
|
.068
|
106.856
|
.000
|
Major Converted 2(Engin.)
|
.265
|
.105
|
2.530
|
.012*
|
Experience Converted 1(<1)
|
.449
|
.113
|
3.979
|
.000*
|
Religion Converted1(Islam)
|
.248
|
.093
|
2.669
|
.008*
|
Religion Converted5(D.W.D)
|
.345
|
.185
|
1.865
|
.063
|
Note: * indicates the statistic is significant at the 0.1 level and ** indicates significant at the 0.05 level
4.8 Relationships between dependent variables
In table 10, results of the Pearson correlation are revealed and it shows that there is a positive correlation between attitude mean scores and preventative practice mean scores of COVID-19 (r=0.219, P <0.01), which simply illustrates that the higher and positive attitude, the higher the better preventative practices and the lower the good attitude indicate the lower the preventative practice of COVID-19 respectively. This simply illustrates that the possession of positive attitude would definitely increase the preventative practices of COVID-19 which fulfil the hypothesis of the study.
Table 10: Relationships between attitude, knowledge and preventative practices of COVID-19
Depended Variable
|
Knowledge scores
|
Attitude Scores
|
Practice Scores
|
Knowledge Score
|
Pearson Correlation
|
1
|
.014
|
.048
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
|
|
.803
|
.403
|
N
|
300
|
300
|
300
|
Attitude Score
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.014
|
1
|
.219
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
|
.803
|
|
.000**
|
N
|
300
|
300
|
300
|
Practice Score
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.048
|
.219
|
1
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
|
.403
|
.000**
|
|
N
|
300
|
300
|
300
|
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).